Features / Abuse prevention

Rate Limiting

Limit repeated operations across relevant dimensions to reduce credential stuffing and slow abuse of compromised identities.

Discuss this use case ↗Read product documentation

Explore the design intent, review practical decisions and validate exact behavior against your deployed configuration.

Why it matters

Make the policy understandable before you automate it.

A single per-IP limit can punish users behind shared proxies while attackers distribute requests. A per-account limit alone may miss abuse spread across accounts or tenants.

Design intent

Make responsibility explicit

Define limits for the relevant user, session, tenant, IP address and operation, using the dimensions supported in your deployment. Treat legitimate higher-volume service identities as explicit cases and measure false positives.

Worked scenario

See it in context

Account recovery has a dedicated operation limit, while the tenant’s overall usage and user’s sessions remain subject to their respective controls.

Boundary to verify

Do not rely on interface alone

Confirm enforcement at the relevant server, API, resource or operational decision point. A hidden button or an informative dashboard is not, by itself, an authorization control.

Practical path

From intent to verified outcome.

Use these stages as a review guide. Exact settings and enforcement points depend on the configured deployment and connected systems.

Define the boundary

Identify the actor, target resource and operation that rate limiting is meant to govern.

Configure the policy

Exercise the edge cases

Account recovery has a dedicated operation limit, while the tenant’s overall usage and user’s sessions remain subject to their respective controls. Also test the path that should be denied, deferred or sent for review.

Review the outcome

Check that the resulting state is understandable and that the decision can be investigated later. For audit-enabled operations, confirm the relevant actor and context are captured.

Before rollout

Questions worth answering.

A capability is easier to operate when ownership, failure behavior and verification are defined upfront.

Confirm the subject, resource and scope affected by rate limiting.
Which operation is vulnerable, which limits are shared, and how will thresholds be tuned without hiding an attack?
Test the expected path and at least one denied, expired or incomplete path.
Make ownership, failure handling and review evidence clear before rollout.

This page describes a design approach based on WebFrolic’s documented product model. Verify feature availability and exact behavior in your environment before relying on it for a control requirement.

Related capabilities

Explore what connects to this.

Follow the related areas to understand how this capability fits within identity, access, lifecycle and operations.

Evaluate with your scenario

Start with a concrete workflow.

Share the identities, resource boundary and decision you want to test. The walkthrough can focus on the relevant behavior rather than a generic feature tour.

Request a walkthrough ↗Explore API reference