Design intent
Make responsibility explicit
Name attributes consistently, define types and validation, decide which identity classes require them, and document whether each field is informational or used for authorization or automation.
Features / Identity data
Capture business-specific profile information while keeping attribute ownership, validation and policy use explicit.
Explore the design intent, review practical decisions and validate exact behavior against your deployed configuration.
Why it matters
Uncontrolled custom fields quickly become inconsistent. An attribute used in an access rule needs clear semantics, a reliable source and validation that prevents ambiguity.
Design intent
Name attributes consistently, define types and validation, decide which identity classes require them, and document whether each field is informational or used for authorization or automation.
Worked scenario
A tenant’s employee ID and department are required for employees but do not become mandatory customer profile fields.
Boundary to verify
Confirm enforcement at the relevant server, API, resource or operational decision point. A hidden button or an informative dashboard is not, by itself, an authorization control.
Practical path
Use these stages as a review guide. Exact settings and enforcement points depend on the configured deployment and connected systems.
Identify the actor, target resource and operation that custom attributes is meant to govern.
Name attributes consistently, define types and validation, decide which identity classes require them, and document whether each field is informational or used for authorization or automation.
A tenant’s employee ID and department are required for employees but do not become mandatory customer profile fields. Also test the path that should be denied, deferred or sent for review.
Check that the resulting state is understandable and that the decision can be investigated later. For audit-enabled operations, confirm the relevant actor and context are captured.
Before rollout
A capability is easier to operate when ownership, failure behavior and verification are defined upfront.
This page describes a design approach based on WebFrolic’s documented product model. Verify feature availability and exact behavior in your environment before relying on it for a control requirement.
Related capabilities
Follow the related areas to understand how this capability fits within identity, access, lifecycle and operations.
Evaluate with your scenario
Share the identities, resource boundary and decision you want to test. The walkthrough can focus on the relevant behavior rather than a generic feature tour.